View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
JackD Senior Member
Joined: 21 Feb 2004 Posts: 243 Location: Rochester, MI
|
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 7:48 pm Post subject: TC 2290: Daved, is it really worth it? |
|
|
Daved or anyone else who can comment:
Is the TC 2290 really worth the money? I've been been struggling for years to break down and buy one, but the thing is so damned expensive. It was like $3,000 ten years ago, but now you can buy one new for $1,600 -$1,700 or used for around a grand.
I know Robben's rig with the TC 2290 sounds great. But frankly, Robben could use a $70 Boss delay and it would still sound great. I currently have a TC D-Two (the poor man's 2290) and only use one or two delay setting--much like RF. I know the 2290 can also do a lot of other stuff, but I'd probably still only use it for a few delay settings.
Is the 2290 really so far ahead of every other delay? Is it worth getting?
I'd really appreciate your thoughts. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kirk95 Starship Captain
Joined: 13 Jul 2003 Posts: 1043 Location: Boulder, CO
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
juspasinby2003 Senior Member
Joined: 18 Dec 2003 Posts: 255
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 6:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
kirk95 wrote: | Yes...buy one ASAP! It is the most overlooked piece of the Robben tone. |
Well - yes and no. The 2290 is clearly the best sounding delay ever made. The sound quality is heads and shoulders above every other high-end delay I've used, but it's not going to infuse your rig with a magic ingredient for the ultimate tone recipe. Pristine sound quality aside, it's a delay after all - it repeats whatever you feed it. Garbage in, garbage out, as they say (or less than optimal in, ...). Robben has the ears and the rig to make the best use of the 2290.
The D-Two is a solid unit with excellent quality delays and more functions than the 2290. For instance, you can set the exact number of repeats that you desire with the D-Two. Not so with the 2290, which uses a single delay line tap with a feedback loop for multiple repeats. You can also do the rhythmic tapping thing with the D-Two (shave and a haircut ...) but not with the 2290. The D-Two even does the dynamic delay trick pretty well.
All things considered, you might be better off spending your cash on improving the other components of your rig. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kirk95 Starship Captain
Joined: 13 Jul 2003 Posts: 1043 Location: Boulder, CO
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
juspasinby2003 Senior Member
Joined: 18 Dec 2003 Posts: 255
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 6:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
kirk95 wrote: | I have owned and tried a lot of delay units...including some of the newer TC units (an M-One I think).
Get the 2290! It's one of the few digital units that doesn't sound digital. It's nice and warm sounding!! |
But David, he's playing a Crate amp. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kirk95 Starship Captain
Joined: 13 Jul 2003 Posts: 1043 Location: Boulder, CO
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
juspasinby2003 Senior Member
Joined: 18 Dec 2003 Posts: 255
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
kirk95 wrote: | Really?? |
Who knows? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iamthewalrus Senior Member
Joined: 03 Dec 2003 Posts: 117 Location: SoCal
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 8:26 am Post subject: My vote for DDL |
|
|
Hi all - I have a TC M1 XL and a Line 6 DL4 stompbox. If all you want is delay the DL4 is the most bang for the buck box I have ever owned; it's awesome. I use it primarily for slap and slighty longer delays (using the tap tempo feature). It has four preset banks you can program and is a deep, deep unit. Get one on eBay with power supply for about $200.
Cheers _________________ iamthewalrus
----------------------------------------------------
Knock knock.
Who's there?
Control freak. Now you say "control freak who." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kirk95 Starship Captain
Joined: 13 Jul 2003 Posts: 1043 Location: Boulder, CO
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 8:29 am Post subject: Re: My vote for DDL |
|
|
iamthewalrus wrote: | Hi all - I have a TC M1 XL and a Line 6 DL4 stompbox. If all you want is delay the DL4 is the most bang for the buck box I have ever owned; it's awesome. I use it primarily for slap and slighty longer delays (using the tap tempo feature). It has four preset banks you can program and is a deep, deep unit. Get one on eBay with power supply for about $200.
Cheers |
You can buy my DL4 for $200 plus shipping. It's in perfect condition with power supply.... _________________ www.hendersounds.com
http://soundcloud.com/davidhenderson
Please Donate - Keep These Forums Alive |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JackD Senior Member
Joined: 21 Feb 2004 Posts: 243 Location: Rochester, MI
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 9:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
The D-Two I mentioned earlier is being used with a few amps I have: an Egnater TOL 100 combo (pre-Rocktron) and an Eganter 50 head through a Bogner 2 X12 Shiva cabinet. I'm also in the process of having a Guytron GT 100 made. In other words, all my amps are pretty high-end and sound fantastic without effects. The D-two sounds great, I just don't know how much greater the 2290 will sound.
I would love to try one out, but I have not found a music store in Michigan over the last 10 years who has one in stock. If anyone knows of a store in Michigan or Ohio (I'd be willing to drive) who stocks the 2290, let me know. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marinblues Senior Member
Joined: 27 Aug 2003 Posts: 553 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
kirk95 wrote: | Yes...buy one ASAP! It is the most overlooked piece of the Robben tone. |
I overlook it as much as I overlook a Dumble or an RF Signature and that's almost exclusively due to their price.
Marin
________
Dc Medical Marijuana
Last edited by marinblues on Tue Mar 01, 2011 9:58 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jconstant Senior Member
Joined: 16 Jul 2003 Posts: 762 Location: Southern California
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kirk95 wrote: | Yes...buy one ASAP! It is the most overlooked piece of the Robben tone. |
I think I'll buy two!!
Dave, seriously, you just may be the biggest gear-head I've ever seen. (Not that there's anything wrong with that.) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kirk95 Starship Captain
Joined: 13 Jul 2003 Posts: 1043 Location: Boulder, CO
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aeolian Senior Member
Joined: 04 Nov 2003 Posts: 886 Location: SF Bay Area
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Are you guys running these in series or parallel? I always run delays in the loop as parallel, full wet and just let as much back in as I want to hear of the slap return. Can't imagine running my carefully designed tube front end through a bunch of op amps and A/D-D/A converters. The 2290 has an analog pass through of the primary signal, as do the Rocktron's and the lowly Alesis (see Garth's current rig). Most effects run everything through an A/D conversion, process everything, then pump it back out through a D/A. All that finely crafted tone gets homogized like if was run through a sampler, because it has been. One easy way to tell if the effect is sampling the main signal is to find one of those Mesa's like the Rectoverb that has a knob on the back that blends between series and parallel loops. Hook the effect box up with no effects turned on, the levels up on the effect and the send and returns on the amp. Slowly turn the knob from series to parallel. The slight delay in the units that digitize everything will cause a phase shift as you go towards parallel.
The only problem with my Intellifex is that it goes in 5ms increments. There isn't any 116, I had to settle for 115 _________________ There are no such things as wrong notes, there's only the look on your face.
My Stuff: www.stevekirbymusic.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Daved Robben Connection
Joined: 08 Aug 2003 Posts: 943 Location: Terra Firma, Ether Sea
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here are 2 related stories:
1) When Robben was rehearsing with Phil Lesh a couple of years ago, Phil's FOH sound engineer, John, approached me about something that was bothering him with Robben's rig. I directed him to Robben personally.
Seems he was bothered that Robben had all this wonderful analog Dumble gear with just the tiniest hint of "edge" being generated by the digital TC 2290. He asked Robben why he accepted that. Robben responded that had indeed, years ago, tried many, many different processors for his delay and, altho, yes, he does hear that slight edge, he has never found anything as good as the TC, so he sticks with it.
John suggested several other units, including more recent ones from TC and Robben said he'd be glad to check them out. So John had half a dozen other units (including more recent TC's) brought in and we went thru them one by one during a dinner break.
When we were done John sat back with a wide eyed look and said, "Well, I'll be damned. You are absolutely right, Robben. NONE of these others sound quite as good!"
2) I was, a few months later, at the TC factory in southern Cal, having Robben's 2290 serviced, when I related this story to one of the head honcho's there who sat with a knowing smile the whole time I told my tale.
When I was done, he told me that there was a reason for this. He explained that "Out of all the processing units in the world, even the more recent TC models, the 2290 is the ONLY one that processes it's info, not in the thousands, but in the millions giving it the truest and warmest of all the processors available out there." And that that was why, after allll these years, they still make the 2290 and it still outsells even their newer models.
So, that is why Robben sticks with the TC-2290. Again, as with the Dumble amps, the advantages may be subtle, maybe even beyond the senses of most players, BUT they are very important for artists like Robben who CAN hear the difference and so..... you get what you pay for. _________________ B C-ing U!
( }:-Daved
"This boy's diseased with rhythm!" -Bing Crosby (Road To Rio, '49) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|