Scott Henderson Discussion :: View topic - Negative Harmony
Scott Henderson Discussion Forum Index

Scott Henderson Discussion
The Official Scott Henderson Discussion Forum

www.scotthenderson.net

 
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
  Chat Users Currently Chatting   

 
Negative Harmony

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Scott Henderson Discussion Forum Index -> Scott Henderson Direct
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
rw852



Joined: 10 Jul 2004
Posts: 9

PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2017 7:32 am    Post subject: Negative Harmony Reply with quote

Hi Scott

Whats your opinion on Negative Harmony ? have you ever applied that to your own composition or , is it just hype ?

cheers
Ricky
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Scott Henderson
The Man


Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 2135

PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2017 4:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's a load of bullshit which means absolutely nothing - it's in the same category as Schoenberg and his twelve tone rows, a way for untalented musicians to come up with music because they have no ears or imagination of their own.

I'm not putting down Jacob Collier because he's a great musician, but a recent review compared him to Bach. WTF?? Collier is an arranger/ improvisor, and I've yet to hear him compose one note of music. Whoever wrote that review is a fucking idiot.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Kevin Thomas



Joined: 01 Apr 2016
Posts: 154
Location: France

PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2017 5:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think this answer is a little half-hearted. Scott, could you please be more direct? Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dizzy



Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 406

PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2017 11:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

To add to the discussion:
I have a guitar student who was curious about "negative harmony". We watched that video of Jacob Collier explaining it. It took us about a half hour of replaying sections of the video until we realized that he was talking about voice leading. He muddied the water so it appeared deep.

Some of the voice leading concepts were interesting to me because I had not thought of them but the same concepts could be learned much more clearly out of a book on voice leading. Scott probably learned the same stuff studying composition right Scott?
The cool thing was that my student realized that he was interested in learning about voice leading and I recommended a book on voice leading.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Scott Henderson
The Man


Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 2135

PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 12:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I didn't make it through the video, but if he was talking about voice leading, I'll take dizzy's word for it. If anyone's an expert on the subject it's Jacob Collier - he's an incredible arranger. A friend just told me that he does have some original music - I haven't heard it so I can't comment, but I highly doubt it's on the same level as Bach, so I'll stick to my opinion of the idiot reviewer who apparently doesn't know the difference between composing and arranging.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
dizzy



Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 406

PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 3:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

One other thing about that video is that Jacob Collier and the guy asking questions are both annoying as fuck. If someone hasn't seen the video yet they should make sure they are in a good mood or they'll feel like punching the screen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
James



Joined: 17 May 2004
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 11:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Negative Harmony sounds as dumb as the term 'atonality'. No such thing! Even Schoenberg hated that word used to describe his music!

I love Schoenberg & the 2nd Viennese School a great deal, especially Webern who implemented the theories & technique best. Just ear/mind altering, expressive and profound stuff. Listening to a lot of classical music affects how you hear other music I have found! But yea .. ultimately divorced from all the dogma .. the 12-tone technique, is just a technique and it all depends on who's using it. It's not all there is.

And trying to put Jacob on Bach's level is just totally & completely ignorant.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Scott Henderson
The Man


Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 2135

PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 4:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My wife has a doctorate in classical performance and is a fan of Schoenberg, so I'd be eating at Panda Express tonight if she read my comment above. You're right, it's just a technique and might be useful in a talented composer's hands. I had to study a lot of the techniques and rules used in classical music in college, and though it was interesting, I'm glad I don't have to pay attention to them now. I think it's more organic to just write what you hear.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
James



Joined: 17 May 2004
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 10:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Laughing

Schoenberg had huge ears and was a bonafide genius .. and you may like some stuff in his free period Scott, before he tried to codify things with all the 12-tone dogma of his late period. Seems your early studies seemed to have turned you off completely from enjoying some classical stuff as a listener. During Arnie's free period he was just going for it, no 12-tone method in place yet. Check out his Chamber Symphony No. 1 op.9, things really take root there. Or the 3rd Orchestral Piece "Farben/Summer by the lake/Chord-Colors" from op. 16. It's hard not to at least appreciate those.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Scott Henderson
The Man


Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 2135

PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 1:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My studies of classical music made me a huge fan - as a listener. Some early classical music is great to listen to, but has too many restrictions to write in that style today. We always had writing assignments in school - for example to write in the style of Beethoven - it was challenging, but nothing I wrote sounded like me. The more modern classical composers threw away the rules and that music appeals to me more in a harmonic way. I'm open minded - I'll check out those Schoenberg pieces - I'm sure the wife has recordings of them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
James



Joined: 17 May 2004
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 10:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Check out Webern's Symphony op.21 too, it's very un-Symphony like at only 9 minutes in length .. your wife probably has that one too. It's one of the most profound pieces of harmonic writing ever set to paper. Great piece.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Scott Henderson Discussion Forum Index -> Scott Henderson Direct All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group